Different methodologies used in a literature review on strategy.

Approaches of Strategy Literature Review

Introduction

In the field of engineering, it is crucial to stay up-to-date with the latest strategies and approaches in order to remain competitive and innovative. One key aspect of this is conducting a thorough literature review to understand the existing knowledge and gaps in the field. This project work aims to explore various approaches to strategy literature review in engineering, focusing on identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the existing system and proposing a new system with enhanced features and advantages.

Problem Statement

The current system of conducting strategy literature reviews in engineering lacks efficiency and effectiveness. Many students and researchers struggle to find relevant and reliable sources, leading to incomplete or outdated reviews. Additionally, the process is often time-consuming and tedious, making it difficult to stay current with the rapidly evolving field of engineering. There is a need for a more streamlined and comprehensive approach to conducting literature reviews that addresses these challenges.

Existing System

The existing system of strategy literature review in engineering typically involves searching for relevant sources using online databases, libraries, and academic journals. Researchers often use search engines like Google Scholar or IEEE Xplore to find articles related to their topic of interest. They then manually review each source to determine its relevance and credibility, a process that can be both time-consuming and subjective.

One major disadvantage of the existing system is the lack of automation and organization. Researchers must manually track and categorize their sources, making it difficult to keep track of the information and identify trends or patterns. Additionally, the reliance on traditional search methods can lead to biases and limited perspectives, as researchers may overlook important sources or focus on a narrow set of publications.

Disadvantages

– Time-consuming and tedious process
– Lack of automation and organization
– Subjective selection of sources
– Limited perspectives and biases
– Difficulty in tracking and categorizing sources

Proposed System

The proposed system for conducting strategy literature reviews in engineering aims to address the limitations of the existing system and provide a more efficient and comprehensive approach. One key feature of the proposed system is the use of machine learning algorithms to automate the process of finding and categorizing sources. By analyzing patterns in the data, the system can identify relevant sources and present them to researchers in a more organized and efficient manner.

Additionally, the proposed system will include a collaborative filtering feature that allows researchers to share and recommend sources with their peers. This will help to broaden perspectives and ensure that researchers are exposed to a diverse set of sources. The system will also include a tracking and citation management tool that allows researchers to easily keep track of their sources and generate citations in various formats.

Advantages

– Automation and organization of sources
– Collaborative filtering for diverse perspectives
– Tracking and citation management tool
– More efficient and comprehensive approach
– Enhanced reliability and credibility of sources

Features

– Machine learning algorithms for automated source categorization
– Collaborative filtering for sharing and recommending sources
– Tracking and citation management tool for organization
– User-friendly interface for easy navigation
– Integration with existing research tools and databases

Conclusion

In conclusion, the proposed system for conducting strategy literature reviews in engineering offers a more efficient and comprehensive approach that addresses the limitations of the existing system. By incorporating machine learning algorithms, collaborative filtering, and tracking tools, researchers can streamline the process of finding, organizing, and citing sources. This system has the potential to enhance the reliability and credibility of literature reviews in engineering and contribute to the advancement of the field. With further development and implementation, the proposed system could revolutionize the way researchers conduct literature reviews and facilitate greater collaboration and innovation in engineering.